![]() Secondly, a lot of predicament of aid and asylum seekers arises not from their own doings. Such an argument is flawed on two grounds- firstly, even though resources are limited but real problem lies in their uneven distribution. A practitioner of lifeboat ethics may argue that countries should only care for their own citizens and maximize their welfare, since resources are limited. These affected people require aid, donations and asylum. A major share of the world's population continues to live in Failed States and underdeveloped countries- reeling under poverty, effects of rapid climate change and scourge of civil wars. Human advances in science, technology, economic growth and governance have failed to reach and improve the living conditions in all countries. All these actions may seem immoral if judged on principles of humanity, but looking from the perspective of lifeboat ethics, these acts seem to be completely justified. Recently the United States came up with a restrictive immigration policy for banning entry of Central American people fleeing violence and poverty. ![]() Even in India, despite having a long history of harbouring refugees, Rohingyas fleeing persecution were not wholeheartedly welcomed. Distraught refugees from war torn countries like Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen have been denied entry in many European countries. In recent times, we have seen nativist, anti-migrant tendencies in developed countries. Going by this analogy, developed or privileged countries tend to not offer aid to poor countries or accept migrants from these countries because they are not under any obligation to do so and it may also stress the resource availability for their own citizens. Hardin lays out the premise of how each nation is similar to a lifeboat with specific carrying capacity and allowing more people onboard will saturate the capacity of the boat, and thus constraining the availability of resources for the original occupants of the boat. Lifeboat Ethics is a metaphor for resource distribution proposed by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1974. Conclude with emphasis on collaboration amongst countries and how openness can benefit all countries.Elucidate its rationale with examples from recent times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |